It's hard & an expensive job raising children these days. I can imagine it so much more difficult financially when its a single parent family.
It's not getting a lot of air-time but today legislation will be put forward by the government to reverse a budget decision that will put single parents (predominantly women) receiving Parenting Payments onto Newstarter Allowance (aka the dole) when their youngest child turns 8 years of age.
I'm all for the push to get people into employment, however, this is ridiculous. It is unfair & a bad change considering how hard it is a) to find a job b) one that is flexible to suit the needs of primary aged children.
In my opinion, children should not be left at home alone till 6pm. Children under the age of 12 let alone 10 should not have to be forced with the responsibility to open & lock up their home or to carry their house keys. Children under the age of 12 should not be operating ovens/stoves/gas without adult supervision. Children of that age need someone to help them with homework, preparing snacks & someone to talk to at the end of a school day.
What would be more reasonable would be when the youngest child turns 12 or is in High School. The child is slightly older but also more mature. They are more responsible & have more knowledge in how to handle sticky situations.
The government's plan would cost parents $60 to $100 a week & save the government $728 million over four years. This is the price they are putting on savings, not realising that in the meantime, single parents will have to pay for before & after school care & other childminding arrangements for school holidays.
Surely there are other savings that the government can obtain? Or at least push the age of the youngest child up. We need to nurture & encourage our vulnerable children & to give single parents the OPTION to parent.
Sources & Pics http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/mps-up-in-arms-over-wheat-and-welfare-20121008-279cp.html#ixzz28ktHncvj http://img.ehowcdn.com/article-new/ehow/images/a08/72/2t/children-child-abandonment-laws-texas-800x800.jpg
It's not getting a lot of air-time but today legislation will be put forward by the government to reverse a budget decision that will put single parents (predominantly women) receiving Parenting Payments onto Newstarter Allowance (aka the dole) when their youngest child turns 8 years of age.
I'm all for the push to get people into employment, however, this is ridiculous. It is unfair & a bad change considering how hard it is a) to find a job b) one that is flexible to suit the needs of primary aged children.
In my opinion, children should not be left at home alone till 6pm. Children under the age of 12 let alone 10 should not have to be forced with the responsibility to open & lock up their home or to carry their house keys. Children under the age of 12 should not be operating ovens/stoves/gas without adult supervision. Children of that age need someone to help them with homework, preparing snacks & someone to talk to at the end of a school day.
What would be more reasonable would be when the youngest child turns 12 or is in High School. The child is slightly older but also more mature. They are more responsible & have more knowledge in how to handle sticky situations.
The government's plan would cost parents $60 to $100 a week & save the government $728 million over four years. This is the price they are putting on savings, not realising that in the meantime, single parents will have to pay for before & after school care & other childminding arrangements for school holidays.
Surely there are other savings that the government can obtain? Or at least push the age of the youngest child up. We need to nurture & encourage our vulnerable children & to give single parents the OPTION to parent.
Sources & Pics http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/mps-up-in-arms-over-wheat-and-welfare-20121008-279cp.html#ixzz28ktHncvj http://img.ehowcdn.com/article-new/ehow/images/a08/72/2t/children-child-abandonment-laws-texas-800x800.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment